Section 428 Alternative Procedures for Permanent Work
How FEMA's Public Assistance Alternative Procedures turn large permanent work projects into fixed, capped grants — what the estimate covers, how excess funds can be used, and when the trade-off is worth it.
Updated 2026-09-14 · Grounded in published FEMA policy documents · Citations checked against current published sources 2026-08-31
Section 428 of the Stafford Act authorizes FEMA to fund large permanent work projects on the basis of fixed, capped estimates instead of actual documented costs. Under these Public Assistance Alternative Procedures (often shortened to PAAP or just "428"), FEMA, the recipient, and the applicant agree up front on the damage description and dimensions, the scope of work, and a fixed cost estimate. The award is capped at the aggregate federal share of that estimate. If actual costs come in below the cap, the applicant may keep the excess and spend it on approved recovery and resilience activities. If costs run over, FEMA will not approve additional funds — the statute requires the applicant to agree to be responsible for any actual costs that exceed the estimate.
Participation is voluntary: the statute makes alternative procedures an election by the state, tribal or local government, or private nonprofit, and FEMA may not condition assistance on that election. But the choice is one-way. Once an applicant accepts a fixed cost offer, the PAPPG states the project cannot revert to standard procedures. That makes 428 a high-leverage decision that rewards applicants with well-defined damage, credible estimates, and disciplined project management.
What Section 428 authorizes
Congress designed the alternative procedures around four goals stated in the statute: reducing federal costs, increasing flexibility, expediting assistance, and creating financial incentives for timely, cost-effective completion. For permanent work under Section 406, the minimum procedures include grants based on fixed estimates, consolidation of multiple facilities into a single project, applicant-provided cost estimates certified by professionally licensed engineers, and retention of excess funds.
In FEMA's published policy (PAPPG v5, Appendix G), alternative procedures apply only to large projects — those at or above the dollar threshold FEMA sets each federal fiscal year, which adjusts annually (see small vs. large projects). Alternative procedures projects are one of three "capped" options in Chapter 8's Flexible Restoration framework, alongside improved and alternate projects. A few boundaries worth knowing:
- Building code and floodplain management administration and enforcement work (category I) cannot be included in an alternative procedures project.
- Temporary facility funds are not included in fixed-cost projects.
- The statute also authorizes alternative procedures for debris removal (with its own fixed estimates and sliding-scale cost share), but this guide covers the permanent work track.
The fixed cost estimate and offer
Before an estimate is developed — by FEMA or provided by the applicant — all three parties must agree to the damage description and dimensions, the scope of work, and any resilience initiatives through hazard mitigation. FEMA then caps funding at the estimated cost to restore the facility to pre-disaster design and function under eligible codes and standards, plus cost-effective PA hazard mitigation tied to the actual restoration scope.
The PAPPG lists what the estimate may include:
- Architectural, engineering, environmental review, and design fees needed to complete the restoration scope;
- All eligible construction and restoration costs, including required permitting fees and project or construction management services;
- Costs of applicable codes, specifications, and standards, including consensus-based codes and approved industry standards under the Bipartisan Budget Act.
Approved mitigation is included as a separate fixed cost amount within the subaward. If the approved mitigation scope is not completed, FEMA reduces the fixed cost amount by the portion intended for mitigation. Fixed cost estimates must also be reduced by applicable credits such as insurance proceeds and salvage value.
Two quality-control features protect both sides. FEMA's cost estimating format builds in contingency factors for hidden damage and unforeseen environmental or permitting requirements. And an independent, FEMA-funded expert panel may review any estimate at FEMA's request; the applicant can request a panel review for any project with an estimated federal share of at least $5 million. The panel reviews cost issues only — it does not decide work eligibility and is not used for appeals. Under the statute, once an estimate certified by a licensed engineer is accepted, it is presumed reasonable and eligible absent evidence of fraud.
FEMA transmits the estimate as a fixed cost offer through PA Grants Manager/Grants Portal. Obligation of the project constitutes FEMA's acceptance of the fixed amount, and after agreement there is no further adjustment except for insurance adjustments and approved changes to the hazard mitigation scope.
Deadlines that control the process
- 18 months from the declaration date for FEMA, the recipient, and the applicant to reach a fixed cost agreement.
- 30 days combined for the recipient and applicant to accept a fixed cost offer from the date FEMA transmits it. If the offer is not accepted, the project is processed under standard procedures based on actual costs — with no flexible use of funds and no excess-fund retention.
- Time extensions to accept an offer must be approved by FEMA's Assistant Administrator for Recovery before the deadline, and denied extensions cannot be appealed.
- 90 days after completing its last alternative procedures project for the applicant to submit a proposed scope and timeline for excess funds to the recipient; the recipient must forward it to FEMA within 180 days.
- 180 days after the last project is complete (or the latest project deadline, whichever comes first) for the recipient to submit closeout certifications so the subrecipient can retain and use excess funds.
One more sequencing rule: an applicant requesting a project for architecture and engineering only must determine the actual scope of work to be performed before a fixed cost offer is transmitted.
Flexible use of funds and excess funds
Unlike a standard project, where funds attach to one specific scope, applicants may share fixed-cost subaward funds across all of their alternative procedures permanent work projects for repair, restoration, or replacement of disaster-damaged facilities and equipment; construction of new facilities including land acquisition; equipment purchases; and cost-effective hazard mitigation.
Once FEMA approves — and the applicant completes — the scope of work, any remaining excess funds may be used for cost-effective activities that reduce future disaster risk and for activities that improve future PA operations or planning. The PAPPG's Table 36 gives concrete examples:
- Eligible with excess funds: hazard mitigation on undamaged facilities; future insurance premiums, including meeting obtain-and-maintain requirements; response and recovery training (including grants management and procurement courses); disaster planning such as debris management or pre-disaster recovery plans; and salaries for PA or emergency management staff.
- Never eligible: paying down debt, covering operating expenses or budget shortfalls, covering the non-federal cost share of FEMA projects or other federal awards, and work on facilities ineligible for failing prior obtain-and-maintain insurance requirements.
FEMA evaluates proposed excess-fund uses for reasonableness and sets a completion deadline that cannot exceed the disaster's period of performance.
Trade-offs vs. standard procedures
| Consideration | Standard procedures | Alternative procedures (428) |
|---|---|---|
| Funding basis | Actual costs, reconciled at closeout; no retention of excess funds | Fixed cost estimate; excess funds retained and usable |
| Use of funds | Only the specific work in each project | Shared across all alternative procedures projects |
| Cost tracking | Costs and work tracked to each work item within each project | Only total costs tracked; work substantiated against the approved scope |
| Scope amendments | FEMA approval required for any change | Notice only for buildings 45 years or older, ground-disturbing activities, or work in or near waterways |
| Overruns | Eligible actual costs adjusted upward | No additional funds; applicant absorbs overruns |
| Appeals | Available under the standard process | Not granted, except cost adjustments after acceptance (insurance, noncompliance, audits) |
The administrative relief is real: changes that substantially conform to the approved scope — material substitutions or interior floor plan reconfigurations, for example — need no FEMA notification at all (except for structures 45 years or older). But the accountability floor does not move. The obtain-and-maintain insurance requirement still applies, closeout still requires certifications covering procurement, EHP, civil rights, insurance compliance, and total actual costs, and the DHS Office of Inspector General retains authority to audit any project, including 428 projects.
The appeals limitation deserves emphasis. FEMA's policy is to resolve all disagreements about damage, scope, or cost before the applicant accepts the fixed cost offer — afterward, the ordinary PA appeals path is essentially closed for these projects.
When Section 428 makes sense
Alternative procedures fit best when damage is well understood and the applicant wants to shape recovery rather than simply rebuild what stood before: consolidating facilities, building new or relocated infrastructure, layering in mitigation, and banking savings for resilience work. The PAPPG frames the benefits as less itemized cost tracking and increased flexibility of funding and restoration — letting applicants focus on long-term recovery and maximize hazard mitigation opportunities.
They fit poorly when the damage description or scope is still disputed, when hidden damage is likely beyond what estimate contingencies cover, or when the applicant cannot absorb an overrun. Because the cap is final and appeals are generally unavailable after acceptance, an applicant that signs on to a weak estimate carries the entire downside. The 30-day acceptance window is the last decision point; open issues must be resolved before it closes.
Have a question this guide doesn't answer? PAPPAIA gives citation-backed answers from PAPPG v5, 44 CFR, and related FEMA Public Assistance policy — free during the public preview.
Ask PAPPAIAFrequently asked questions
What is a Section 428 alternative procedures project?
It is a large permanent work project funded on a fixed cost estimate rather than actual costs reconciled at closeout. Section 428 of the Stafford Act authorizes FEMA to cap Public Assistance funding at an agreed estimate, and PAPPG v5 Appendix G limits these projects to large projects (at or above the annually set large-project threshold). Participation is elective, and the statute bars FEMA from conditioning assistance on that election.
What happens if actual costs exceed the fixed cost amount?
FEMA will not approve additional funds. Under the statute, the applicant agrees to be responsible for any actual costs that exceed the estimate. FEMA's cost estimating format includes contingency factors for hidden damage and unforeseen environmental or permitting requirements, but once the fixed amount is agreed, the only adjustments are for insurance and approved hazard mitigation scope changes.
Can a Section 428 project go back to standard procedures?
No. The PAPPG states that once an applicant accepts a fixed cost offer, the project cannot revert to standard procedures. The reverse happens automatically, though: if the recipient and applicant do not accept the offer within their combined 30-day window, the project is processed under standard procedures based on actual costs.
What can excess Section 428 funds be used for?
After the approved scope of work is complete, excess funds may go to cost-effective activities that reduce future disaster risk and activities that improve future PA operations or planning — for example, mitigation on undamaged facilities, future insurance premiums, training, disaster planning, and PA staff salaries. They can never pay down debt, cover operating expenses or budget shortfalls, or cover the non-federal cost share of federal awards. The applicant must submit a proposed scope and timeline to the recipient within 90 days of completing its last alternative procedures project.
Can you appeal a FEMA decision on a Section 428 project?
Generally no. FEMA does not grant appeals on alternative procedures permanent work projects except for cost adjustments made after the fixed cost offer is accepted, such as those related to insurance, noncompliance, or audits. Denied time extensions to accept a fixed cost offer also cannot be appealed, so disagreements about damage, scope, or cost must be resolved before acceptance.
How long do applicants have to reach a Section 428 fixed cost agreement?
FEMA, the recipient, and the applicant must reach a fixed cost agreement within 18 months of the declaration date, and the recipient and applicant have a combined 30 days to accept a fixed cost offer after FEMA transmits it. Extensions must be approved by FEMA's Assistant Administrator for Recovery before the deadline.
Sources
- PAPPG v5, Appendix G: Alternative Procedures for Permanent Work — Standard vs. alternative differences (Table 35), fixed cost estimate and offer, deadlines, use of funding and excess funds (Table 36), SOW changes, closeout, insurance, appeals, OIG — PDF pp. 293–300
- PAPPG v5, Chapter 8: Permanent Work Eligibility — Flexible Restoration (Capped Projects): improved, alternate, and alternative procedures projects; temporary facility funds excluded from fixed-cost projects — PDF pp. 187–188
- PAPPG v5, Chapter 9: Scoping, Costing, and Final Reviews — Project Thresholds — large/small project threshold set each federal fiscal year — PDF pp. 232–233
- Stafford Act § 428 (42 U.S.C. § 5189f), Public Assistance Program Alternative Procedures — Goals, elective participation, fixed estimates with applicant responsibility for overruns, consolidation, expert panel at $5 million federal share, certified estimates presumed reasonable, excess-fund uses — PDF pp. 71–74
This guide summarizes published FEMA Public Assistance policy for general information. It is not legal advice, and PAPPAIA is not affiliated with or endorsed by FEMA or any government agency. Always verify against the policy version that applies to your declaration and consult your FEMA or recipient points of contact for case-specific decisions.